Dr. Claudia Albers Ph.D.

1026. NASA’S deception mission: hide Planet X and the true universe Dr. Claudia Albers, Planet X Researcher In Article 1025: NASA lies: The ISS cannot possibly be in orbit [1] I showed that the International Space Station (ISS) cannot possibly be in orbit because there are huge Planet X Stellar Cores (SCs), the cores of the destroyed Planet X planets and stars, in the earth’s atmosphere which would have been a collision hazard to the ISS. But there is a lot more evidence which also clearly shows that what NASA is showing and telling the public about space and its missions is a lie. Figure 1. A screenshot from a video supposedly taken of the earth from the ISS: The Sun is simulated with a laser beam, notice that it is in the form of a white beam of light. This is so obviously fake and so obviously done in a studio that it has to be a disclosure (see Article 350: Why is video of Earth from the ISS produced in a studio?) [2] All footage supposedly shot from the ISS

1015. In search of Vulcan: Planet X observed traversing the Sun since 1818 Dr. Claudia Albers, Planet X Researcher The existence of planet Vulcan, a planet, which was supposed to orbit the Sun, inside the orbit of Mercury, was proposed by the French mathematician Urbain Le Verrier, in 1859. He proposed the existence of the planet because of an inconsistency in Mercury’s orbit, where its perihelion position advances by 0.02 o per year, a tiny amount, which can be nearly be accounted for by the influence of the other known planets, in the Solar System, leaving a discrepancy of 0.004 o per year, which could be explained by an additional intra-Mercurial planet. Le Verrier had made a similar proposal regarding Uranus’ orbit, which led to the discovery of the planet Neptune, an indication that the proposal was valid.  Figure 1 . Mercury’s orbit is quite eccentric and as a result of the planet never retraces its orbit exactly, an effect which is called perihelion advance, the

1005. Planet X in the sky and California earthquakes Dr. Claudia Albers, Planet X Researcher Figure 1 below shows a photograph sent to me by Ryan of the sky in California. It shows the typical cloud formation characteristic of the large Planet X Stellar Cores when they penetrate into the earth’s atmosphere. These objects are huge and emit blue light from their surfaces but the objects’ cloud envelope is sparse and typically has a clumpy aspect, which can be seen in this case, above some lower altitude clouds. In addition, the Sun appears to be a reflection from off the cloud surface, which is also typical of these objects being in the sky, as the simulators, in orbit, cannot be seen through such a huge. Figure 1. Photograph of the sky sent in by Ryan, over Citrus Heights California, the photograph was taken in the morning, on July 16 th 2019. The top layer of cloud seems to be at one uniform height with blue seen in between, a typical cloud formation observed when a la

1002. Large Planet X object observed over Canada Dr. Claudia Albers, Planet X Researcher Figure 1 below shows a screenshot from a video from the YouTube channel Crying Hippy, which is entitled: Cottage Cheese Clouds. This is an appropriate descriptive term for the clouds in the sky, which are very clumpy with patches of blue sky in between. But they are also characteristic clouds associated large Planet X Stellar Cores (SCs) in the sky, which have these clouds as part of their sparse cloud envelopes. Planet X SCs are energy depleted cores of the destroyed Planet X planets. They are coming inside the earth’s atmosphere and can be observed from the surface. Figure 1. Screenshot showing the sky over Canada: The clouds are clumpy and characteristic of the cloud envelope of a large Planet X Stellar Core (SC) in the sky (Source: YouTube Video by Crying Hippy, 15 July 2019, entitled: Cottage Cheese Clouds) [1]. Figure 2 . The cloud pattern is similar to this one over

936. Birch Bay extreme low tide not due to a spring tide Dr. Claudia Albers, Planet X researcher In Article 934: Ocean recession in Birch Bay Washington due to Planet X [1], I talked about an ocean recession event in Birch Bay, which I now understand is not actually unprecedented as has been happening periodically for a very long time. But it started me thinking about whether the official explanation regarding high and low tides is actually correct and the difference between normal and spring tides is actually correct. It turns out that it is not. A spring tide cannot in any way explain what occurred in Birch Bay, Washington. Figure 1. A spring tide (official explanation taught in every classroom around the world) when the sun and moon are aligned, at the new and full moon.  When the moon is in its third-quarter or new moon phase lower high tides called Neap Tides occur. Spring tides are one third higher than normal tides, as the Sun’s effect on tides, is only half

998. Ocean temperature anomaly: earth being terraformed Dr. Claudia Albers, Planet X Researcher A world map showing ocean temperatures is shown below. The ocean temperatures seem to me to be abnormally high. However, I do not have any clear historical reference frame except in the case of the ocean water along the west coast of Portugal, where I used to swim as a child. The water along that coastline was also extremely cold. I remember how my feet hurt as I entered the water, which suggests that it could not have been any higher than 19 o C and perhaps more like 17 o C, but the map shows that the water along the Portuguese coastline is now above 21 o C (70 o F). Figure 1 . World map showing surface ocean temperature [1]. The ocean temperature appears to be abnormally high just north of the equator around the whole earth, and at times, in regions that are on the equator. You would expect the temperature to be higher where the ocean is shallower but the ocean temperature

996. California fissure: ground suddenly dropping during earthquakes Dr. Claudia Albers, Planet X Researcher Figure 1 below shows a screenshot from a video of a fissure, which formed in the desert, during the recent earthquakes, which started in the Ridgecrest area and included a 7.1 magnitude earthquake. The ground is clearly lower on one side of the fissure and is also consistently lower on the same side of the fissure, which goes on for many miles. The cracks or smaller fissures on the ground close to the main fissure clearly show that a dropping ground on one side was the main movement that led to the formation of this fissure. Figure 1. Screenshot from a video of the fissure, which formed during the recent large number of earthquakes in California, close to the Ridgecrest region and most likely during the 7.1 magnitude earthquake which occurred on June 5 th 2019 ( Source: YouTube Video by KTLA5, 6 June 2019: Fissure Visible in Desert After Earthquakes in Southe