936. Birch Bay extreme low tide not due to a spring tide
936. Birch Bay extreme low tide not due to a spring tide
Dr. Claudia Albers,
Planet X researcher
In Article 934: Ocean recession
in Birch Bay Washington due to Planet X [1], I talked about an ocean recession
event in Birch Bay, which I now understand is not actually unprecedented as has
been happening periodically for a very long time. But it started me thinking
about whether the official explanation regarding high and low tides is actually
correct and the difference between normal and spring tides is actually correct.
It turns out that it is not. A spring tide cannot in any way explain what
occurred in Birch Bay, Washington.
Figure 1. A
spring tide (official explanation taught in every classroom around the world)
when the sun and moon are aligned, at the new and full moon. When the moon is in its third-quarter or new
moon phase lower high tides called Neap Tides occur. Spring tides are one third
higher than normal tides, as the Sun’s effect on tides, is only half that of
the moon’s. The tides affect the whole world, a region at 12:00 midday or
midnight would experience a Spring Tide and a region at 6:00 am or pm would
experience a spring low tide worldwide.
Figure 2. We need
to determine how much stronger the moon’s gravitational force is at A than at B.
The distance between the center of the moon and point A is
and the
distance between the center of the moon and point B is given by
Then, the difference in
the gravitational attraction by the moon between points A and B is given by
But we actually only need the
relative difference, which is given by
Since the distance between the
center of the moon and the center of the earth is rEM = 3.844 x 105 km and the radius of the
earth is rE = 6371 km.
Then, if we repeat the calculation for the Sun, we get:
So the difference in
gravitational attraction which the Sun can provide which is what leads to tidal
effects is much weaker than the moon’s, it is 0.000084/0.033 = 0.0025. This
means that the moon and the Sun together cannot possibly cause the tide to be
one third higher when they act in unison. In order for that to be possible the
additional force that the Sun would have to provide would have to be one-third of what the moon could provide, i.e. 0.011 but the sun’s effect is much
lower than that. The Sun’s effect is infinitesimal compared with the moon’s and
cannot, therefore, explain the observed sea-level changes during what is called
a spring tide.
This means that even though the
tide occurring in Birch Bay may have been occurring for some time, the accepted
explanation of it being a Spring Tide, i.e. due to the Sun and the moon being
in alignment, is impossible. It cannot be true; the Sun does not provide enough
tidal effect to explain it.
In addition, irrefutable ocean
recession events around the world in 2017 and 2018 show that everything we have
been told about gravity in every classroom around the world, is actually a lie.
Figure 3. Ocean recession events in Uruguay and Brazil on August 11th
and 12th 2017. These were local events as the whole world did not
have an unprecedented low tide within a few hours of this event and neither
were unprecedented high tide events reported.
So these ocean recession events
occurred locally or in small regions, not worldwide. So the explanation that a
low tide is caused by ocean water getting bunched up under the moon and thus
causing a lower sea level in other regions is simply impossible.
Figure 4. If gravity is only attractive the only way we can get a
low tide is by water accumulating under the moon, creating a bulge, so that the
level is lower at regions, which are at 90o to the moon’s position,
over the surface of the earth. But if the low tide is in a small region, that
cannot explain it. The only explanation then is that gravity is both attractive
and repulsive.
Figure 5. If gravity was only attractive, any local lower sea level
would be impossible as water always flows to equalize the level. So all that an
object close to the surface of the earth would be able to cause is a tidal
bulge than the water in the surrounding region would flow to equalize the level
around it, a tidal hollow would be impossible. So a local low tide or ocean
recession event has to be due to a difference in the local gravitational field,
which thus shows that gravity is both attractive and repulsive. In this case,
it is as if an object is repelling the water rather than attracting it.
In conclusion, the Birch Bay lower
than normal tide cannot be explained by a Spring Tide and what is being taught
about gravity and about tides in every classroom around the world is a lie.
References:
[1] Albers, C. (2019). Article 934: Ocean
recession in Birch Bay Washington due to Planet X.